2026 AGA临床实践:痔疮的诊断和治疗(更新版)
**原文标题**: 2026 AGA临床实践:痔疮的诊断和治疗(更新版)
---
CLINICAL PRACTICE UPDATES
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of
Hemorrhoids: Expert Review
Waqar Qureshi, 1 Sook Hoang, 2 Jeanetta Frye, 3 and Satish SC. Rao 4
1 Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; 2 Department of Surgery, University of Virginia
Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; 3 Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville,
Virginia; and 4 Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
DESCRIPTION:
Hemorrhoids are a common problem. The diagnosis and treatment can be challenging.
Gastroenterologists have much to offer these patients. The purpose of this American Gastro-
enterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update Expert Review is to provide best
practice advice (BPA) covering the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoid disease.
METHODS:
This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice
Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic
of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the
CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and
Hepatology. These BPA statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and
from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements
do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented
considerations.
BEST PRACTICE ADVICE STATEMENTS
BPA 1:
The diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids is within the purview of the gastroenterologist.
The diagnosis and grading of hemorrhoids is easily made by taking a history from the patient
and examining the patient. Symptoms caused by hemorrhoids include bleeding, itching,
discomfort, and/or prolapse. Hemorrhoids only cause significant pain when acutely throm-
bosed. Sharp pain on defecation is most likely anal fissure.
BPA 2:
Dietary and lifestyle modifications, including increasing fiber intake and avoiding straining or
prolonged time on the toilet, are reasonable first-line therapies for symptomatic hemorrhoids.
The use of sitz baths for symptom improvement in symptomatic hemorrhoids is often advised,
but scientific data is limited.
BPA 3:
Topical treatments, including anesthetics, astringents (witch hazel), corticosteroids, and
vasoactive agents, can be considered for treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids, but there is
little data to support efficacy. Topical steroids should not be used for more than 2 weeks at a
time.
BPA 4:
Anoscopy should be performed, whenever possible, on every new patient with suspected
hemorrhoids, prior to treatment, to ensure accurate diagnosis.
BPA 5:
Both hemorrhoid banding and infrared coagulation are safe, effective, and easy to perform in
the office setting. Infrared coagulation and rubber band ligation have similar benefits in the
short term. Rubber band ligation has longer-term benefits for treatment of prolapsing hem-
orrhoids and recurrent bleeding. Hemorrhoid banding or infrared coagulation should be
employed prior to surgical hemorrhoidectomy for grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids.
Most current article
© 2026 American Gastroenterological Association Institute. Published by
Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data
mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
1542-3565/$36.00
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2026.04.008
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2026;24:1773–1781
BPA 6:
As part of informed consent for hemorrhoid therapies, the patient must be made aware of the
small possibility of pelvic sepsis as a complication. Patients should be counseled about the risk
and instructed to present to the emergency department immediately for evaluation, if
indicated.
BPA 7:
In patients with active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, hemorrhoid disease management
should be delayed until complete remission is achieved.
BPA 8:
Hemorrhoids occur in up to two-thirds of women during pregnancy. Treatment should
generally involve conservative management, including fiber, treatment of constipation, and
topical ointments. If symptoms persist postpartum, or if a woman is planning further preg-
nancies, standard treatment such as banding or infrared coagulation can be considered.
BPA 9:
Acute thrombosed hemorrhoids are often extremely painful. They are best treated surgically
with incision and drainage.
BPA 10:
Consultation with a surgeon should be offered to patients with grade 3 internal hemorrhoids
who fail banding procedures or have associated external hemorrhoids. Large skin tags can be
removed without a hemorrhoidectomy if they are not associated with significant hemorrhoids.
Grade 4 internal hemorrhoids require surgical hemorrhoidectomy.
BPA 11:
Patients with cirrhosis and hemorrhoids should be carefully examined so as not to confuse
hemorrhoids with rectal varices. Hemorrhoids in patients with cirrhosis can be treated with
banding or infrared coagulation. In patients with significant coagulopathy, infrared coagulation
is preferred to banding. Concomitant portal hypertension should not alter this approach. For
most clinicians, significant coagulopathy means a platelet count of less than 50,000 per
microliter or international normalized ratio greater than 2.0. The presence of concomitant
portal hypertension should not alter this approach.
H
emorrhoids are a common concern for patients,
and gastroenterologists frequently care for patients
with hemorrhoidal complaints. There are a wide range of
treatment options ranging from behavioral and dietary
modifications to office-based procedures or surgical ther-
apy. Selection of an appropriate treatment path may be
complex and is guided by patient symptom(s) and severity
of disease. Navigating these treatment modalities, in an
evidence-based approach, is imperative to appropriately
treat and manage symptomatic hemorrhoids.
BPA 1: The diagnosis and treatment of hemor-
rhoids is within the purview of the gastroenterolo-
gist. The diagnosis and grading of hemorrhoids is
easily made by taking a history from the patient and
examining the patient.
Symptomatic hemorrhoids are common, with almost
one-half the population of 50-year-olds having symp-
toms of active hemorrhoid disease. Over 23 million
Americans suffer from hemorrhoid symptoms, resulting
in about 3.5 million visits to the doctor and an
expenditure of over $500 million in health care costs. 1,2
Most hemorrhoid disease, just like most anorectal
disease, can be diagnosed and managed in the office
and is increasingly managed by the gastroenterologist.
With age, enlargement and displacement of the normal
vascular cushions in the anal canal can lead to symp-
toms. Hemorrhoid symptoms include bleeding, itching,
discomfort, prolapse, or a combination of these.
Hemorrhoids only cause significant pain when acutely
thrombosed.
Internal hemorrhoids are graded according to the
degree of prolapse (Table 1). This grading system, also
known as Goligher’s classification, is based mostly on
the patient’s history. Although the findings can be
confirmed on examination, a good history will classify
the severity of the internal hemorrhoids under this
classification. 3 There is no standard classification for
external hemorrhoids, and the description is frequently
subjective. Typically, rectal bleeding is more likely from
internal hemorrhoids and itching more likely from
external hemorrhoids. If the patient complains of sharp
pain on defecation or has sharp pain on digital rectal
exam, then the diagnosis is most likely anal fissure.
However, anal fissure and hemorrhoid disease may
coexist in up to 20% of cases. In this situation, the anal
fissure should be treated first. 4 During inspection, the
perianal area may reveal redundant skin tags, some with
a bulge. These are often vestiges of previous thrombosed
hemorrhoids and are harmless and best left alone.
Clinically, it is important to differentiate rectal prolapse
from prolapsing hemorrhoids. Rectal prolapse is the
intussusception of the rectal wall through the anal canal,
presenting with circular folds of pink rectal mucosa,
because of loss of normal rectal attachments. Prolapsed
hemorrhoids should have radial folds and engorged
blood vessels.
1774 AGA
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Vol. 24, Iss. 7
Although the diagnosis is frequently made on the
basis of history alone, a good anorectal examination in
the left lateral decubitus position including a perianal
examination, a careful digital rectal exam, and if avail-
able, anoscopy, aids diagnosis. Anoscopy allows a good
view of the entire anal canal so that condylomas or early
anal cancer is not missed. A full colonoscopy should be
considered in patients with rectal bleeding to rule out
concomitant or more serious disease.
BPA 2: Dietary and lifestyle modifications,
including increasing fiber intake and avoiding
straining or prolonged time on the toilet are
reasonable first-line therapies for symptomatic
hemorrhoids. The use of sitz baths for symptom
improvement in symptomatic hemorrhoids is often
advised, but scientific data is limited.
Constipation has long been associated with hemor-
rhoid development. A study using colonoscopy data
from a large clinical trial found that constipation,
including straining during bowel movements, was
associated with increased risk of hemorrhoids. 5 This
study also found that a diet high in grain fiber was
associated with a reduced risk for hemorrhoids. 5 Mea-
sures to improve constipation, specifically increasing
fiber intake, are recommended in many guidelines on
symptomatic hemorrhoid management. 6,7 Evidence for
this primarily comes from 2 systematic reviews
analyzing 7 studies comparing fiber with placebo, and
found moderate evidence to support the use of fiber to
improve overall symptoms and specifically bleeding in
patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. 8,9
A study of 102 patients with advanced, symptomatic
hemorrhoids addressed altered defecation patterns
including increased straining, prolonged defecation
time, frequent bowel movements, and fiber intake. In
this study, patients were advised to limit time on the
toilet to 3 minutes, defecate once daily, avoid straining,
and consume at least 20 to 30 grams of fiber. Results
showed improvement in prolapse and bleeding. 10
The use of sitz baths to treat symptomatic hemor-
rhoids is not addressed in several of the most recent
guidelines from Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery
societies. 6,7 Sitz baths are used to treat several anorectal
disorders, but there is limited scientific evidence for
symptomatic hemorrhoids. 11–13 Manometric studies
have shown that patients with hemorrhoids have
increased anal sphincter pressures. 14 It is postulated
that warm sitz baths reduce anal sphincter pressure and
may improve symptoms in hemorrhoid disease. A re-
view of 36 articles on the use of sitz baths and anorectal
disorders found little evidence to support improvement
in symptoms and highlighted the need for more research
in this area. 15 Moreover, patients may feel that the use of
bidets may limit puritis related to hemorrhoid disease
by improving hygiene and avoiding repeated friction
from toilet paper.
BPA 3: Topical treatments, including anesthetics,
astringents (witch hazel), corticosteroids, and vaso-
active agents can be considered for treatment of
symptomatic hemorrhoids, but there is little data to
support their efficacy. Topical steroids should not be
used for more than 2 weeks at a time, because
prolonged use can thin the skin and cause it to
become more sensitive.
There are many over-the-counter options for the
treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. These specif-
ically are classified into anesthetics, astringents and
protectants, corticosteroids, and vasoactive agents.
Some provide temporary relief of symptoms, particu-
larly during a flareup, for example, following a bout of
constipation, although their efficacy has not been well-
studied. 6,7,11–13 For symptoms of burning and soreness,
ointments that contain lidocaine pramoxine or benzo-
cane might be helpful, whereas inflammation and
swelling with intense itching, may respond better to a
brief course of hydrocortisone cream or suppository.
For minor itching and irritation, witch hazel is helpful.
Some Preparation H products have phenylephrine, a
vasoconstrictor that will temporally shrink blood vessels
and reduce swelling or bleeding. Compounds with zinc
oxide, mineral oil, or petrolatum provide protective
barriers that can help heal and soothe the irritated skin
around the hemorrhoids.
BPA 4: Anoscopy should be performed, whenever
possible, on every new patient with suspected
hemorrhoids prior to treatment to ensure accurate
diagnosis.
Anoscopy is superior to flexible endoscopy and is the
preferred method to examine the anal canal (Figure 1). 16
Anoscopy should not be confused with high-resolution
anoscopy, which involves the use of a colposcope
meant to detect intraepithelial neoplasia or early
changes related to anal cancer. Anoscopy is done
following the digital rectal exam with the patient in the
Table 1. Goligher’s Classification of Hemorrhoid Disease
Grade
Description
Grade 1
Do not prolapse below the dentate line; bleeding only
Grade 2
Prolapse below the dentate line, during defecation but spontaneously reduce
Grade 3
Prolapse below the dentate line and require manual reduction
Grade 4
Prolapse and stay below the dentate line and are not reducible
July 2026
AGA 1775
left lateral decubitus position. The procedure is easy to
learn and perform. 17 The best anoscopes to examine the
anal canal and visualize hemorrhoids, are disposable
slotted or beveled anoscopes with a built-in light. Bev-
eled scopes can be rotated, without risk of trauma to the
hemorrhoid column (Figure 2 and Supplementary Video
1). In tense or nervous patients, the anoscope may be
easier to insert by asking the patient to bear down
during the process, which relaxes the pelvic floor mus-
cles. Although anoscopy is usually done in the office
setting, it can certainly be performed following a colo-
noscopy for better assessment of the anal canal.
BPA 5: Both hemorrhoid banding and infrared
coagulation are safe, effective, and easy to perform
in the office setting. Infrared coagulation and rubber
band ligation have similar benefits in the short term.
Rubber band ligation has longer-term benefits for
the treatment of prolapse and recurrent bleeding.
Hemorrhoid banding or infrared coagulation should
be employed prior to surgical hemorrhoidectomy for
grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids.
Rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids is
offered as an office-based procedure and can be
effective treatment of grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids
(Supplementary Video 2). The procedure is performed
in the office without sedation. The lubricated anoscope
is inserted into the anus, and the internal hemorrhoid
tissue is identified. The rubber band is placed above or
proximal to the dentate line and is therefore well-
tolerated. The ligated hemorrhoidal tissue will un-
dergo ischemia and necrosis, leaving behind an ulcer
that eventually will scar and tack the mucosa to the
rectal wall. This achieves 2 purposes: (1) to prevent
mucosal prolapse; and (2) to reduce blood flow into
the hemorrhoid and cause it to shrink. Rubber band
ligation has been found to be the most effective office-
based procedure, with success rates ranging between
66% and 94%. 18 Success is generally defined as reso-
lution of symptoms and successful treatment of pro-
lapse. There are several hemorrhoid banding devices
on the market (Figure 3). Although banding is effective
for grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids, efficacy of treatment
varies by grade. A Cochrane review identified that
rubber band ligation was found to be equally effective
as surgical excision for the treatment of grade 2
hemorrhoids, but not as effective as surgical excision
for grade 3 hemorrhoids. 19 Complications occur in 2%
of cases and range from urinary retention and bleeding
to secondary fissure formation. If a band is deployed
too close to the dentate line, it will cause pain and
should be removed immediately, easily accomplished
by the clinician using the finger to roll the band off of
the hemorrhoid or directly massaging the hemorrhoid
in a circular fashion. Although extremely rare, pelvic
sepsis has been reported as a possible complication of
rubber band ligation. 20
Infrared coagulation (IRC) uses heat energy to induce
coagulation and fibrosis in the submucosal layer around
the origin or pedicle of the internal hemorrhoid to
reduce blood supply and cause the hemorrhoid to shrink
(Supplementary Video 3). The procedure is commonly
performed under direct vision through an anoscope. It
works particularly well for grades 1 and 2 internal
hemorrhoids and also for many grade 3 hemorrhoids.
The IRC 2100 (Redfield Corp) is a nonendoscopic
system consisting of a compact power unit with a
tungsten-halogen lamp (Figure 4). A pistol-shaped hand-
held applicator connects to the power unit and delivers
light energy to the tip of the shaft. The energy is applied
in 1- to 1.5-second bursts just proximal to the visible
internal hemorrhoid column in 5 or 6 spots. If the pa-
tient feels pain or burning during the procedure, a
transmural burn might be occurring, and the energy
applied needs to be reduced. This is repeated for each
column, resulting in coagulation and necrosis, visible as
a white spot. The treatment may need to be repeated in
a few weeks to completely control the symptoms. Oc-
casional post-procedure discomfort can be treated with
over-the-counter analgesia. Although IRC is a safe and
rapid procedure, the risks include pain and burning if
too much energy is applied, causing a transmural burn
or ulceration. IRC is not suitable for large, prolapsing
hemorrhoids.
Figure 1. This is a picture of the right posterior hemorrhoid
column as seen through an anoscope. The changing color is
the junction between the internal and external hemorrhoid,
the so-called dentate line.
1776 AGA
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Vol. 24, Iss. 7
Rubber band ligation and IRC seem to have similar
outcomes in the short term. However, studies suggest
that, although rubber band ligation may be associated
with more post-procedure discomfort, its efficacy is
longer lasting than IRC. 20–23 Sclerotherapy for the
treatment of hemorrhoids has been largely aban-
doned because of the potential for complications,
such as a misplaced sclerosing injection and reduced
efficacy compared with safer modalities. 24 IRC is
favored in certain circumstances, such as in patients
who are on anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents,
where there is an increased risk of bleeding when the
band falls off. IRC may also be preferred in pregnancy
and in young people with significant irritable bowel
syndrome symptoms. Lower abdominal cramping that
could follow hemorrhoid banding can cause undue
anxiety in the pregnant patient. Patients with IBS
tend to be more sensitive to banding, and therefore
IRC may be a better option, but there is very little
evidence in the literature to support this, so further
studies are needed. Any post-procedural discomfort
can be treated with over-the-counter analgesia, such
as acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs.
BPA 6: As part of informed consent for hemor-
rhoid therapies, the patient must be made aware of
the small possibility of pelvic sepsis as a complica-
tion. Patients should be counseled about the risk
and instructed to present to the emergency depart-
ment immediately for evaluation, if indicated.
Figure 2. This photograph shows a beveled, disposable
plastic anoscope with a built-in light. The built-in light makes
it very convenient and easy to use. The second anoscope in
the white background is a slotted anoscope, and therefore
cannot be rotated while inside the anal canal so as not to
cause damage to the internal hemorrhoid column.
Figure 3. There are several different types of disposable hem-
orrhoid banding devices on the market. Here is a figure showing
3 such devices. Although they look different, they all have the
same mechanism of action in that a syringe-like suction device
pulls the hemorrhoid mucosa into a cylinder and releases a band
over the mucosa. They are not difficult to learn to use but do
need some practice.
July 2026
AGA 1777
Possible complications following hemorrhoid band-
ing include bleeding, pain, vasovagal symptoms, slip-
page of bands, priapism, and thrombosed hemorrhoids.
Major complications include pelvic sepsis and death,
which are fortunately very rare. In one prospective
study of 512 patients who underwent rubber band
ligation, 37 patients or 7.2%, had complications, 4.7%
of these were minor. 18 Significant bleeding, severe
pain, or perianal fistula developed in 2.5% of the pa-
tients. 18 Infectious complications following rubber
band ligation include pelvic sepsis, which is the most
serious and can be lethal, liver abscesses, Fournier’s
gangrene, tetanus, and bacterial endocarditis. Pelvic
sepsis can develop any time between 3 and 10 days
following banding. Although rare, pelvic sepsis is a
potentially life-threatening complication that can
develop after hemorrhoid surgery and office-based
procedures such as rubber band ligation. Patients
may present with severe post-procedural pelvic pain,
urinary dysfunction, and worsening swelling and
induration of the perineum. Patients may also present
with systemic symptoms such as fevers, muscle aches,
and changes in mental status. Presentation of any
concerning symptoms should prompt an immediate
evaluation. The most frequent symptoms from pelvic
sepsis are severe pain and urinary retention. We pro-
vide written instructions to all patients following
hemorrhoid banding to return to the emergency room
immediately should they develop any of the following:
severe pain, urinary retention, fever, chills, or signifi-
cant bleeding. A diagnosis of pelvic sepsis requires
immediate and aggressive intervention, which may or
may not require surgery. Although complications with
IRC are less common, aggressive application of thermal
energy could cause a transmural burn that could result
in an abscess.
BPA 7: In patients with active Crohn’s disease or
ulcerative colitis, hemorrhoid disease management
should be delayed until complete remission is
achieved.
There is very little in the scientific literature about
the safety and efficacy of hemorrhoid treatment in the
presence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Consul-
tation with an IBD expert, and a surgeon are often
required prior to hemorrhoid treatment. In patients who
go on to surgical hemorrhoidectomy, there is a higher
risk of complications in patients with IBD, although this
risk seems to be lower in more recent studies, possibly
due to the introduction of biologics. 25 The literature is
scant and based on small series, regarding the outcome
of office management of hemorrhoid disease in IBD.
Expert opinion would dictate that IBD is treated
aggressively, and the patient should be in remission
prior to hemorrhoid banding or IRC. Should conserva-
tive management be unsuccessful, then surgical options
should be explored in highly selective cases. 26 In one
retrospective study of excisional hemorrhoidectomy in
36 patients with Crohn’s disease in remission, 4 patients
developed complications over a mean follow-up of 31
months that included 1 anal stricture, 1 perianal ab-
scess, 1 nonhealing wound, and 1 hemorrhoid recur-
rence. 27 Anal skin tags are frequently seen as a result of
long-standing external hemorrhoid disease but also
occur frequently in IBD, particularly in Crohn’s disease.
In either situation, surgery is not advised, although
young patients presenting with abdominal symptoms of
pain and or diarrhea need to be worked up to exclude
Crohn’s disease. 28 A thorough anoscopic exam and
sometimes examination under anesthesia may be
necessary to exclude active disease and provide an ac-
curate diagnosis.
BPA 8: Hemorrhoids occur in up to two-thirds of
women during pregnancy. Treatment should gener-
ally involve conservative management, including fi-
ber, treatment of constipation, and topical
ointments. If symptoms persist postpartum, or if a
woman is planning further pregnancies, standard
treatments such as banding or infrared coagulation
can be considered.
Hemorrhoids usually develop during the third
trimester of pregnancy, largely from the enlarging
uterus increasing the intra-abdominal pressure and
causing venous stasis and vascular engorgement of the
inferior mesenteric veins. 29 Also, extrinsic compression
of the rectum may cause excessive straining and pro-
longed defecation time leading to constipation. Addi-
tionally, prolonged pushing especially during the second
Figure 4. This is a photograph of the infrared coagulation
device, where the top black handle has a probe with a tip at
the end that becomes extremely hot to provide diathermy to
the proximal end of the hemorrhoid column. This procedure
is performed under direct vision through an anoscope and is
easy to learn.
1778 AGA
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Vol. 24, Iss. 7
stage of labor may induce or aggravate hemorrhoids and
cause prolapse. 29 Hemorrhoids are very common during
pregnancy, with one study of 835 pregnant women
reporting a prevalence of 86%. 29,30 Another study found
that 33% had thrombosed external hemorrhoids or anal
fissures during pregnancy and/or postpartum. 31 A pro-
spective cohort study of 94 patients that followed
women from the second trimester up to 3 months post-
partum found that anal symptoms were reported by 50%
during pregnancy, 14% developed hemorrhoidal pro-
lapse during the third trimester, 14.6% had hemorrhoid
thrombosis, and 13.5% developed prolapsed hemor-
rhoids in the immediate postpartum at 3 months. 32
Another prospective cohort study that evaluated 290
women at 4 time points found that 40.7% developed
hemorrhoids in the first trimester, and 61% in the third
trimester, and 37.4% during or after delivery. 31 Multi-
variate analysis identified specific risk factors that
included excessive straining during delivery for more
than 20 minutes (odds ratio [OR], 29.75%; 95% confi-
dence interval [CI], 4.00–221.23), birthweight of newborn
>3800 g (OR, 17.99; 95% CI, 3.29–98.49), constipation
(OR, 18.98; 95% CI, 7.13–50.54), and personal history of
perianal diseases (OR, 11.93; 95% CI, 2.18–65.30).
Treatment of hemorrhoids in pregnancy primarily
involves the use of topical medications including hy-
drocortisone suppositories to reduce inflammation,
bleeding, and/or pain with banding or IRC delayed until
postpartum. Systemic absorption from these ointments
or creams (see BPA 3) is minimal, and they are therefore
considered safe in pregnancy. When necessary, symp-
tomatic hemorrhoids can be managed mostly in an office
setting in a similar fashion as nonpregnant patients are
managed if one cannot wait until after delivery. 33 During
pregnancy, IRC may be preferred to hemorrhoid banding
because there is less post-procedural discomfort. It is
also advisable to involve the obstetrician regarding any
treatment decisions. There are few randomized studies
of hemorrhoids in pregnancy, and hence, most treat-
ment recommendations are based on expert opinion. 29
BPA 9: Acute thrombosed hemorrhoids are often
extremely painful. They are best treated surgically
with incision and drainage.
Thrombus formation within the external hemor-
rhoid can cause significant swelling and pain. Patients
will complain of feeling a mass or a nodule, and this can
be associated with bleeding. A thorough evaluation is
important to diagnose a thrombosed external hemor-
rhoid. Historically, when a patient presents early in the
course of disease (within 72 hours), excision in the
office or operating room is offered. Early incision and
drainage (I&D) provides the most effective and rapid
relief of symptoms compared with conservative mea-
sures. When I&D is performed, it is important to “de-
roof” the cavity so that it does not reform with the
incision closing over. It is important to distinguish
between I&D, which can be performed by a gastroen-
terologist in the office or done in the emergency room,
and thrombectomy, which is slightly more involved,
involving the removal of the entire thrombosed part of
the hemorrhoid and using sutures to close, which is
usually performed by surgeons. When it comes to im-
mediate relief of pain, the outcomes are very similar. In
office, I&D of a thrombosed hemorrhoid is very easy to
perform and is shown in the accompanying video
(Supplementary Video 4). Antibiotics are not required
following this procedure.
BPA 10: Consultation with a surgeon should be
offered to patients with grade 3 internal hemor-
rhoids who fail banding procedures or have asso-
ciated external hemorrhoids. Large skin tags can
be removed without a hemorrhoidectomy if they
are not associated with significant hemorrhoids.
Grade 4 internal hemorrhoids require surgical
hemorrhoidectomy.
Surgical opinion should be sought for patients who
remain symptomatic despite medical therapy. Most
symptomatic grade 1, grade 2, and many grade 3 in-
ternal hemorrhoids can be treated by office-based pro-
cedures. Patients with symptomatic grades 1 to 3
hemorrhoids who cannot tolerate or fail office-based
procedures, or those with concomitant external hemor-
rhoids, should be referred to surgery. Also, patients with
grade 3 hemorrhoids who do not respond well to
banding and all patients with grade 4 hemorrhoids
should be referred to surgery.
Other surgical options for internal hemorrhoids
include hemorrhoidopexy and Doppler-guided hemor-
rhoidectomy. A circular stapling device is used in sur-
gical hemorrhoidopexy to plicate the mucosa by creating
a mucosal anastomosis. This technique was found to be
well-tolerated, with patients experiencing less post-
operative pain compared with excision hemor-
rhoidectomy. 34 However, on long-term follow-up,
patients were found to have an increased rate of
recurrence. Due to the increased risk for significant
complications, including rectovaginal fistula, rectal
perforation, bleeding and staple-line stricture, hemor-
rhoidopexy has fallen out of favor as a surgical option
for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. 35
Doppler-guided
hemorrhoidectomy
utilizes
a
Doppler probe to identify and ligate the hemorrhoid
artery without an excision. In some instances, the sur-
geon may choose to perform a mucosal pexy for symp-
tomatic, prolapsed hemorrhoids. As no excision is
performed, patients report less postoperative pain and it
is well-tolerated with minimal complications. 36
Surgical excision of hemorrhoids remains the definitive
procedure for surgical management of hemorrhoids. 33 In
the surgical suite, the entire hemorrhoid complex (internal
and external) is dissected off the internal anal sphincter
muscle and excised. The surgeon may choose to leave the
incision site open or close it with suture; however, the
closed approach is associated with a decreased risk for
postoperative bleeding and faster wound healing. The
overall complication rate after surgical excision is
July 2026
AGA 1779
low—between 1% and 2%. Complications range from
urinary retention, bleeding, infection and fistula formation
to the rare but morbid complication of pelvic sepsis.
Patients with external hemorrhoids can be offered sur-
gical excision if they present soon after the onset of symp-
toms. Most thrombosed external hemorrhoids will resolve
without any surgical treatment, but excision can provide
early relief of symptoms. If surgery is offered, complete
excision and evacuation of the clot should be performed.
BPA 11: Patients with cirrhosis and hemorrhoids
should be carefully examined so as not to confuse
hemorrhoids with rectal varices. Hemorrhoids in pa-
tients with cirrhosis can be treated with banding or
infrared coagulation. In patients with significant coa-
gulopathy, infrared coagulation is preferred to banding.
Concomitant portal hypertension should not alter this
approach. For most clinicians, significant coagulopathy
means a platelet count of less than 50,000 per micro-
liter or international normalized ratio greater than 2.0.
Hemorrhoid disease is commonly found in the
cirrhotic patient. Rectal varices are portosystemic col-
laterals that develop as a complication of portal hyper-
tension. Cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension can
experience exacerbation of hemorrhoidal vascular
congestion and have rectal varices in 30% of cases. 37 It
is important to differentiate rectal varices from hemor-
rhoids. Rectal varices tend to be found in the mid and
more proximal rectum, compared with hemorrhoids,
which are usually distal and go across the dentate line.
Although it is uncommon for rectal varices to bleed, the
bleeding can be life-threatening. Although endoscopic
treatment with cyanoacrylate injection or with coils
frequently controls bleeding, the risk of embolism re-
mains and rebleeding rates are high. Management of
underlying portal hypertension is essential in patients
with bleeding rectal varices, with procedures such as
transhepatic portosystemic shunts, or as an alternative,
balloon-occluded, retrograde transvenous obliteration
by interventional radiology and are often effective. One
study found this technique to be 100% successful, with a
72% clinical success rate at 1-month follow-up. 38
Conclusion
Hemorrhoid disease is a common cause of anorectal
complaints, such as rectal bleeding, perianal pain, and
discomfort. The diagnosis and initial management of
hemorrhoids can be performed by the gastroenterolo-
gist. Anoscopy and digital rectal examination are
essential parts of the anorectal examination and can be
performed in the outpatient clinic. Hemorrhoid banding
and IRC are safe and effective modalities for the man-
agement of grade 1 and grade 2 hemorrhoids, and the
decision to refer to a surgeon should be individualized.
Special consideration should be placed for patients who
are pregnant and patients with cirrhosis. Surgical hem-
orrhoidectomy can be a low-risk procedure, but patients
should be counseled on the possibility of complications
such as bleeding, recurrence, and pelvic sepsis.
Supplementary Material
Note: To access the supplementary material accom-
panying this article, visit the online version of Clinical
Gastroenterology and Hepatology at www.cghjournal.
org, and at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2026.04.
008.